Zhiwen Zheng’s Peer Review

Suggestions

• Reducing learning outcomes
• Providing more effective ways to help colour-blind students

What we improved or MAY NOT improved

• There are four main essential questions in our project and each question contains 1-2 learning outcomes. In our opinion, all learning outcomes are important and necessary, so we do not reduce any of them finally.
• The main purpose of using different colours in our project is to highlight the key words or sentences. Therefore, in order to help colour-blind students, we also bold all highlighted words or sentences.

Alireza Tahmasebi’s Peer Review

Suggestions

• “Will there be deadlines for formative and summative assessments, or will students complete the activities and assessments at their own pace?”
• “On the pages for topic 2, topic 3, and topic 4, the outcomes differ from the ones that were written on the page for learning outcomes”
• “Make sure you cite any source(s) that you used in the first paragraph for describing experiential learning and list the references at the end of the page” and “ensure that you cite and reference the source(s) you used for describing cognitivism”
• “I recommend trying the Colourblind Web Page Filter, which lets you filter your webpages based on colour filters and helps you make sure that the best colours are chosen for the design of the website”
• The links of learning activities in topic 2, 3, and 4 have been invalid.

What we improved or MAY NOT improved

• Students will complete the learning activities and assessments at their own pace.
• The learning outcomes for topic 2, topic 3, and topic 4 are changed and align with the page for learning outcomes.
• The sources in experiential learning and cognitivism are cited.
• The links of learning activities in topic 2, topic 3, and topic 4 are improved.

Yisi Min’s Peer Review

Suggestions

• “There should have some content or link jump when I click Description & Rationale and Assessment. It looks a little empty now”

What we improved or MAY NOT improved

• We do not change this part because both the “Description & Rationale” and “Assessment” are our primary categories and there are a few secondary categories under the primary categories.

Killian Baron’s Peer Review

Suggestions

• “Topic 4 doesn’t have an assessment, though this may be to give students time for the summative assessment, you may want to consider adding another assessment for this topic”

What we improved or MAY NOT improved

• The assessment for topic 4 is included in the final summative assessment; therefore, we do not change this part.